Risk Management Archives

PFOA: Science & Litigation | 11/15/2018

October 21st, 2018|Categories: Complex Business Litigation, Environmental Torts, HB Tort Notes, Torts-On-Demand-CLE|Tags: environmental law, PFOA, Risk Management, Scientific & Medical Studies, Toxicology|

[one-third-first] DATE: Nov. 15, 2018 TIME: 2 p.m. EDT; 1 p.m. CDT; 12 p.m. MDT; 11 a.m. PDT PLACE: Your computer or mobile device PRICE: $197* per dial-in site *Price is good through Oct. 31. After that it's $247. GROUPS ARE GOOD: Registering qualifies you to multiple attendees at your location. CLE: 1 credit Please send CLE questions to CLE@LitigationConferences.com speakers Michael Dourson, Ph.D., DABT, FATS, FSRA Director of Science Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment (TERA) Register now and get: Access for multiple colleagues at your location. Practical insights from a board-certified toxicologist. A through and informative PowerPoint presentation for later reference. Answers to your questions via live chat. CLE credit. And more! [/one-third-first] [two-thirds] PFOA Toxicology: What's a Safe Level for the Environment? What toxic tort and environmental attorneys need to know about this ubiquitous compound. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) has been described as more toxic than methyl mercury. Yet not all organizations tasked with developing safe-dose levels agree on the best approach for PFOA, resulting in recommended levels that are more than 100-times apart. Differences in these recommended safe-dose levels result in cleanup costs that vary by billions of dollars. Background Environmental contamination with PFOA has been known for some time. In the early 2000s safe doses in drinking water were considered to be in the range of 30-to-50 parts per billion. Recent safe-dose assessments by EPA, [...]

Financial Services Cyber Risk Information Sharing

September 26th, 2018|Categories: HB Risk Notes, Insurance, Technology Law|Tags: cybersecurity, data breach, data privacy, insurance claims recovery, Risk Management|

Why We Need to be More Like Apes, Less Like Seagulls By Tom Hagy Featuring Craigg Ballance, Director of Canadian Member Services, FS-ISAC Even before we can walk we are encouraged to share. We’re told to share our things even when we barely have any. Even some wild animals share food and resources – even when those resources are scarce. Some creatures are better at it than others, of course. Apes and lions? Absolutely. Seagulls? All you have to do next time you’re on the beach is toss what’s left of your ham sandwich into the air and see how generous gulls are. People fall into sharing -- and not-fond-of-sharing -- groups, too. Sharing is particularly critical in the financial sector where, while privacy and security regulations command a tight lid on data, global financial institutions are successfully sharing data about cyber risk, says Craigg Ballance, Director of Canadian Member Services for FS-ISAC in Toronto. But, he says, sharing has to take place across a broad landscape. “Information analysis sharing has to cut across the various subsets of the financial sector,” says Ballance. “While banks share local data, they are trying more and more to share globally, but,” he says, “banks need to share with other institutions, like insurers, investment funds, pension funds, and other types of financial institutions, for this [...]

Cognitive Shortcuts: Assessing Case Value & Litigation Risk with Homer Simpson and Spock

September 11th, 2018|Categories: Complex Business Litigation, Environmental Torts, HB Tort Notes|Tags: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Arbitration, complex litigation, emerging litigation, Mediation, Risk Management, toxic torts|

By Jeff Trueman, Esq. Mediator The central question on the minds of counsel, their clients, and insurance professionals in civil litigation is, of course, “What’s the case worth?” Although lead paint litigation may be going through some changes, it remains a mature tort where enough historical settlement and verdict data exist for counsel to argue why a particular case should or should not fit within a certain settlement range. In the midst of these discussions, the human brain plays tricks on us. For example, litigators sometimes assume that their trial experience can determine how jurors will negotiate with one another and resolve factual discrepancies after closing arguments. This assumption is a “heuristic” – a cognitive shortcut called attributional error or illusion of control. Underneath the games of litigation “chicken” that are the hallmark of settlement negotiation, heuristics lead to erroneous valuations and assessments of risk. Although more than one hundred heuristics exist, approximately 15-20 occur commonly in the context of settlement negotiations. It is easy for potential clients to employ a heuristic similar to the illusion of control by imagining a connection between something they desire, such as a favorable case outcome, and the past successes of their prospective lawyer. Representative and confirmation biases influence how we connect “model” to “outcome.” When differences over case value intensify, litigators return to threats [...]

Courtney Klein on Social Media & Security

August 1st, 2018|Categories: Corporate Compliance, HB Risk Notes, Law Firm Operations|Tags: compliance, cybersecurity, Law Practice Management, Risk Management, social media|

A Restructured Paradigm for Corporate Teamwork By Courtney Klein of Soteria Risk Consultants Social media has become an integral part of everyday life. It’s how some of us get our news, research our opinions, learn about local events, and connect with friends. For the modern western business, it is also immensely important for staying in touch with customers, advertising, and overall visibility. For this reason, many companies employ veritable armies of “Social Media Specialists” that do everything from designing graphics to writing tweets to replying to customer questions and complaints. Some companies interact with each other (such as the hilarious and long-standing Twitter Battle between Wendy’s and McDonald's), and some use it as their primary form of communication. Customers, too, know that social media is a way to get in touch with a company - for good reasons and for bad - and while many companies are aware that they will and do receive threats on social media, very few of them have any kind of protocol in place for how to deal with them – and even fewer still encourage their social media teams to pass this information on to or (better yet) work together with their security team. This sort of blasé attitude to threats – either because “it’s not my job” or “they can’t be serious” – leads to [...]

A.I. Best Practices: Rules and Policies for Using Artificial Intelligence in Your Business

July 30th, 2018|Categories: HB Risk Notes, Insurance, Technology Law|Tags: cybersecurity, data breach, data privacy, Insurance Companies, Risk Management|

Explore how cybersecurity breaches impact insurance, risk management, and data privacy with evolving legal and compliance challenges. [one-third-first] DATE: Sept. 27, 2018 TIME: 2 p.m. EDT; 1 p.m. CDT; 12 p.m. MDT; 11 a.m. PDT PLACE: Your computer or mobile device PRICE: $197* per dial-in site *Price is good through Aug. 16. After that it's $247. GROUPS ARE GOOD: Registering qualifies you to multiple attendees at your location. CLE: 1 credit Please send CLE questions to CLE@LitigationConferences.com SPEAKER: John Frank Weaver Attorney McLane Middleton Your registration includes: • A site license to attend this webinar (invite as many people in one location as you can fit around your computer at no extra charge). • Downloadable PowerPoint presentations from our speakers. • The opportunity to connect directly with speakers during the audience Q&A session. • At least one-hour of CLE credit. Produced in collaboration with and their new Journal of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Law [/one-third-first] [two-thirds] Nearly every industry is adopting or preparing to adopt artificial intelligence applications into their business practices. That's exciting. However, there are almost no government regulations for their use and few resources providing best practices that anticipate ethical considerations and forthcoming legal requirements. This lack of direction poses a serious problem as A.I. applications become more widespread. Businesses are creating their own ad hoc practices without considering the [...]

McLoughlin on Artificial Intelligence in Banking

July 25th, 2018|Categories: Corporate Compliance, HB Risk Notes, Technology Law|Tags: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Banking & Finance, compliance, fraud, Risk Management|

"Capital adequacy requirements are not the only kind of regulation that AI is helping banks to meet. An even bigger area is monitoring of trading activities for misconduct and abuse. The Bank of England estimates that misconduct by traders has cost banks a global cumulative of $320 billion to date. For this very large reason, banks are aggressively deploying machine learning to monitor the behavior of their traders and detect unusual behavior." Read Michael McLoughlin's post on LinkedIn. Michael McLoughlin is Global Digital Transformation Partner & Advocate with Microsoft.

Judy Selby on Improving Cyber and Privacy Board Reporting

July 19th, 2018|Categories: Corporate Compliance, HB Risk Notes, Technology Law|Tags: compliance, cybersecurity, Directors & Officers, Information Technology Law, Risk Management|

"While general awareness of cyber risks among corporate boards is increasing, even the most motivated and knowledgeable directors cannot effectively fulfill their duties without receiving appropriate data about the organization’s risk profile. Unfortunately, however, there appears to be a disconnect between management and boards when it comes to cyber risk reporting . . . In order for directors to effectively discharge their duty of active, informed, and engaged oversight, the information they receive must be relevant, understandable, reliable, and objective." Judy Selby, JD Judy Selby Consulting Read the full article and Judy's tips for improving board reporting. Judy Selby of Judy Selby Consulting

BitSight Releases eBook on Use of A.I. & Big Data in Continuous Cyber Risk Monitoring

July 18th, 2018|Categories: Corporate Compliance, HB Risk Notes, Technology Law|Tags: compliance, cybersecurity, data breach, data privacy, Risk Management|

"With every reported data breach or cyberattack, the cyber risk landscape gets a little more complex. Cyber criminals create new attack vectors, cybersecurity professionals develop new controls to protect their systems, the criminals get to work circumventing the controls, and so on.The result of this back and forth is that cyber risk professionals have a huge variety of risk factors to worry about. In response, risk managers and security specialists need to develop extremely complex cybersecurity programs to make sure all of their bases are covered. "With so many cybersecurity risks to consider, it’s inevitable that some will receive less attention than they deserve. Unfortunately, these overlooked risk factors could play a role in your next cyberattack, and if your financial services firm isn’t prepared, that could be extremely costly." Read more. We're looking forward to seeing the BitSight team in Bermuda Dec. 6-7, 2018, at the International Cyber Risk Management Conference.

Crowell & Moring on Insurance for Autonomous Vehicles Accidents

July 17th, 2018|Categories: Complex Business Litigation, HB Risk Notes, Technology Law|Tags: complex litigation, compliance, emerging litigation, Liability Claims, Risk Management|

"As responsibility for accidents shifts away from drivers and towards the companies that design, manufacture, and maintain autonomous vehicles, the pool of companies potentially liable for accidents will deepen.Companies need to consider potential liability risk when designing autonomous vehicle-related systems and partnering with other companies." Another good piece from the team Crowell & Moring LLP

Miller Friel: Opioid Suppliers Are Right to Expect Insurance Coverage

June 1st, 2018|Categories: Complex Business Litigation, HB Risk Notes, HB Tort Notes, Insurance|Tags: complex litigation, Insurance Companies, Liability Claims, professional liability, Risk Management|

An excerpt from a post by Bernard Bell of Miller Friel PLLC "Because insurers are facing a difficult time evading coverage for opioid claims, they are raising all sorts of non-contractual defenses to avoid coverage, including a 'social insurance' argument they have raised in the past. "If past public health crises are prologue, these arguments will run something like this: Holding insurers responsible to pay for the costs of public services, including health care, will transform private party liability insurance into social insurance to underwrite public health epidemics caused by all manner of ills. According to insurers, this will, at a minimum, increase the cost of liability insurance, and financially harm liability insurers, who have not priced this risk into their premiums. Moreover, holding insurers liable to pay will shift costs away from those best equipped to address the social problem; the companies that supply the opioid products. "These arguments are inconsistent with insurance law, which permits parties to freely contract to cover risks, and which place the burden on insurers to pay for insured risk, even if they made an error in underwriting. Courts interpret insurance contracts according to their language and construe them against insurers if they are ambiguous, and in favor of an insureds’ reasonable expectations of coverage. "Moreover, to the extent courts are inclined to look past [...]