Two logos side by side with Critical Legal Content in a red square on the left and HB Litigation in blue on the right

Using AI to Strengthen Law Firm Content Development—Without Losing Judgment or Voice | In-Depth Webinar

March 26th, 2026|Categories: CLE OnDemand, Emerging Litigation & Risk, New Featured Post for Home Page, New Webinars|Tags: , , , , |

In this webinar, Tom Hagy and Paul Ryplewski share a practical, editorially grounded approach to using AI in law firm content development. Drawing on legal and marketing expertise, they explain how firms can generate stronger ideas, improve clarity, and repurpose existing content—while maintaining accuracy, judgment, and authentic voice. The session offers actionable strategies for integrating AI into legal marketing workflows without sacrificing credibility or control.

Read More

We Can’t Drive High, But Can We Own a Gun High? Supreme Court to Decide.

March 13th, 2026|Categories: Emerging Litigation & Risk, Journal, New Featured Post for Home Page, News|Tags: , , |

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear United States v. Hemani, a case that could redefine the how gun rights and drug policy peacefully co-exist. At issue is whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)—which prohibits firearm possession by anyone who “is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance”—violates the Second Amendment as applied to cannabis users. Read about this precedents, counter positions, and a bit of history.

Read More

Cyber Risk Management & Insurance Part 2: Advanced Level Webinar

March 8th, 2026|Categories: CLE OnDemand, Complex Business Litigation, Emerging Litigation & Risk, Insurance, New Featured Post for Home Page, New Webinars|Tags: , , , |

In this advanced-level webinar, Joshua Gold, Luma Al-Shibib, and Miranda Jannuzzi examine how evolving cyber threats, artificial intelligence risks, and expanding privacy laws are reshaping cyber insurance coverage and claims. The program explores emerging exposures—including pixel tracking litigation, system damage, and business interruption—while providing practical guidance on navigating underwriting, coverage disputes, and regulatory scrutiny in an increasingly adversarial cyber insurance landscape.

Read More

From AI Principles to Proof: What DOJ Scrutiny Means for Corporate Governance

March 5th, 2026|Categories: Emerging Litigation & Risk, Journal, Law Firm Operations, New Featured Post for Home Page, News|Tags: , , , , |

In this article, Tom Hagy and Reed Smith partner Adria Perez examine how the Department of Justice’s new AI Litigation Task Force is shifting corporate expectations from AI principles to proof. Drawing on insights from The Emerging Litigation Podcast, they discuss how regulators now expect companies to demonstrate real oversight, documented controls, and defensible governance as AI becomes embedded in compliance, investigations, and corporate decision-making.

Read More

SCOTUS Rejects Contractor Immunity Sought by Prison Company

March 2nd, 2026|Categories: Emerging Litigation & Risk, Journal, New Featured Post for Home Page, News|Tags: , , , |

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held in The GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal that private government contractors cannot claim “derivative sovereign immunity” to avoid suit. Writing for the Court, Justice Kagan clarified that the Yearsley doctrine provides only a defense to liability—not immunity from litigation—and never shields unlawful conduct. The ruling ensures that claims alleging forced labor at a privately operated immigration detention facility will proceed on the merits and reinforces that sovereign immunity belongs to the government alone.

Read More

DOJ’s AI Litigation Task Force and What It Signals for Corporate AI Governance with Adria Perez

March 2nd, 2026|Categories: Corporate Compliance, ELP, New Featured Post for Home Page|Tags: , , , |

In this episode, host Tom Hagy speaks with Reed Smith partner Adria Perez about the DOJ’s AI Litigation Task Force and what it signals for corporate AI governance. They examine how regulators are shifting from high-level AI principles to demanding documented controls, audit trails, and defensible oversight—and what legal departments must do to meet rising enforcement and board-level expectations.

Read More

Summary Judgment and Sham Affidavits: Protecting Your Motion from Contradictory Testimony

March 2nd, 2026|Categories: Emerging Litigation & Risk, Journal, New Featured Post for Home Page, News|Tags: , , , , , , , , |

In this article, Cat Gavrilidis of Swift Currie examines how inconsistent testimony can undermine summary judgment and how courts apply the sham affidavit rule when affidavits contradict prior deposition statements. She explores jurisdictional differences and outlines practical steps attorneys can take to prevent contradictions, correct the record, and protect a well-founded motion before trial.

Read More

Habeas Corpus in Real Time: Minnesota’s Detention Docket Dusts Off Ancient But Foundational Remedy

February 26th, 2026|Categories: Emerging Litigation & Risk, Journal, New Featured Post for Home Page, News|Tags: , , , |

A surge of emergency habeas corpus petitions in Minnesota is reshaping immigration detention litigation. Federal judges are issuing expedited orders, blocking detainee transfers, and demanding immediate statutory justification for custody. With cases such as Hassan v. Bondi, Astudillo Laica v. Bondi, and U.H.A. v. Bondi, courts are treating habeas review as urgent injunctive relief while confronting jurisdictional risks and mandatory-versus-discretionary detention disputes. As practitioners like E. Michelle Drake of Berger Montague navigate a rapidly expanding docket, Minnesota has emerged as a focal point in a nationwide rise in detention challenges—highlighting the continuing power of habeas corpus as a real-time check on executive detention authority.

Read More

FTC Warns Law Firms About Diversity Certifications – This Time Alluding to Antitrust

February 18th, 2026|Categories: Emerging Litigation & Risk, Journal, New Featured Post for Home Page, News|Tags: , , , , |

The FTC has warned major U.S. law firms that participation in diversity certification programs could raise antitrust concerns, framing coordinated diversity efforts as a potential labor-market competition issue. This article examines the Commission’s cautionary letters regarding the Mansfield Certification program, the broader pattern of executive branch pressure on law firms and media organizations, and recent court decisions addressing discrimination claims and government retaliation. It also explores how antitrust enforcement, free speech concerns, and regulatory scrutiny are converging to reshape the legal and media landscapes. As political pressure and enforcement intensify, firms must reassess collaborative initiatives while preserving independence and competitive integrity.

Read More

FTC Warns Law Firms: Rethink Your Diversity Collaborations — Listen Now!

February 13th, 2026|Categories: ELP, New Featured Post for Home Page|Tags: , |

The FTC has warned dozens of major U.S. law firms that participation in diversity certification programs could raise antitrust concerns. This episode examines the agency’s cautionary letters regarding the Mansfield Certification program, the potential for coordinated diversity efforts to be viewed as labor-market collusion, and the broader regulatory pressure facing law firms and media organizations. It also explores recent court decisions, executive branch enforcement trends, and the growing intersection of antitrust law, free speech, and diversity initiatives. As scrutiny intensifies, firms must navigate evolving legal risks while maintaining independence and competitive integrity.

Read More

Using AI to Strengthen Law Firm Content Development – JD Supra ‘Office Hours’ with Tom Hagy

February 8th, 2026|Categories: Emerging Litigation & Risk, Journal, Law Firm Operations, New Featured Post for Home Page, News|Tags: , , |

In a JD Supra Office Hours session, legal content strategist Tom Hagy shared practical guidance on how law firm marketers can use AI to strengthen — not replace — their content development process. Framing AI as an editorial assistant rather than an author, Hagy explained how marketers can use the technology to generate better ideas, improve structure, translate legal complexity for business audiences, and repurpose existing firm content more effectively. He also emphasized that human judgment remains essential for accuracy, voice, and credibility. The discussion offers a clear, practical roadmap for integrating AI into law firm marketing workflows while maintaining editorial standards and client trust.

Read More

Opioid Addiction Litigation 2026: The New Post-Mega-Settlements Normal, Why Tribal Claims Are Central, and a Federal Pullback on Treatment Programs

February 7th, 2026|Categories: Emerging Litigation & Risk, Environmental Torts, HB Tort Notes, Journal, Mass Torts, New Featured Post for Home Page, News|Tags: , , |

Opioid litigation has entered a new phase defined less by courtroom trials and more by long-term settlement governance, tribal sovereignty, and evolving bankruptcy law. National opioid settlements now fund abatement through strict reporting and multi-year payment schedules, while Tribal Nations administer parallel sovereign recovery systems. At the same time, the Supreme Court’s Harrington v. Purdue Pharma decision has reshaped how mass-tort bankruptcies resolve claims. Yet as litigation-driven funding stabilizes, federal support for addiction treatment and overdose prevention faces deep cuts and growing uncertainty. Together, these developments show opioid litigation moving into a complex era where courts, settlements, and public policy intersect.

Read More
Go to Top