Concepts: Toxic Torts; Personal Injury Litigation

Carbon monoxide poisoning is one of the most dangerous—and most overlooked—sources of catastrophic injury.

Because it's odorless, colorless, and often mistaken for the flu, victims may not realize they've been exposed until long after the evidence has begun to disappear. That reality creates unique challenges not only for families, but also for the attorneys trying to prove what happened.

In this episode, I speak with Sam Cannon of Cannon Law about the complexities of carbon monoxide poisoning litigation and why these cases often involve far more than a faulty appliance. We discuss how deferred maintenance, inadequate safety practices, and layered ownership structures can combine to create dangerous living conditions—and why proving liability often requires identifying multiple responsible parties. 

Sam also explains the science behind carbon monoxide exposure, why injuries can be difficult to diagnose, and how advanced imaging, toxicology, atmospheric readings, and expert testimony help establish both exposure and long-term brain injury. We also explore common defense strategies, the critical role of expert witnesses, and why these cases frequently become battles over causation as much as negligence. 

Whether you're a plaintiff attorney, defense lawyer, insurance professional, or simply interested in how invisible hazards become complex litigation, this conversation offers practical insights into one of the most technically challenging areas of personal injury law.

Jump in to hear Sam's perspective on carbon monoxide litigation, proving brain injury, and the litigation strategies that shape these high-stakes cases.

Thanks to Sam Cannon for joining me and sharing his experience and insights into this important—and often overlooked—area of litigation.

I hope you enjoy the conversation! If so, give us a rating!

Tom Hagy
Litigation Enthusiast and
Host of the Emerging Litigation Podcast
Home Page
LinkedIn